Post by Willow on Apr 2, 2004 10:05:47 GMT -5
This is to alert you to turn on your TV Thursday night, April 1st at
10 P.M. EST for the Penn and Teller show on Showtime.
Taking the bull by the ... horns?
Tom Jicha
March 28, 2004
America has a reputation for cynicism that is undeserved: It's amazing how
much nonsense we accept unquestioningly. The wildly inventive Penn & Teller
prefer a more vulgar term for nonsense. They call it Bull----!
They've made it the title of their Showtime series, which on Thursday launches its
second season of debunking ... nonsense.
Some of the episodes are fairly frivolous, such as upcoming shows on
people's unreasonable fears -- you'll never be freaked out by a
public toilet again -- and the ridiculous lengths singles go to in pursuit
of a mate.
But the first target of the new season is a serious one: People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). The touchy-feely name is only
the start of the organization's ... nonsense, Penn & Teller argue. Of course,
Penn does all the talking. Teller is the Harpo Marx of this act.
PETA's mission statement is that it doesn't want animals to be
killed, hurt, exploited or embarrassed. These are laudable goals within reason,
which PETA rarely is. If PETA had its way, Penn notes, everyone would have to
become vegans; shoes would be made of something other than leather; rodeos
and circuses would be eliminated, as would horse and dog racing. Fishing
wouldn't be allowed, zoos would be closed and harvesting honey would
end, because this is an exploitation of bees.
Any medical research involving animals, even if it meant cures for
AIDS and cancer, would cease. PETA would not even approve of guide dogs for
the blind, again an exploitation of animals in its warped thinking.
Despite the first three letters of its name, there would be no pets, because this
amounts to slavery, according to Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder and
president.
The latter contention is one of the reasons for the program, Penn
explains. Many pet owners are donors to PETA, unaware of its extremist agenda.
They are also oblivious to the fact that the money they think they are
donating toward the welfare of animals goes to support arson and bombing of
buildings and other terrorist acts, according to Penn. These allegations are
documented through tax returns and admissions from PETA officials and
a confessed felon whose activities have been underwritten by the group.
Penn displays PETA ads that show emaciated Holocaust victims and mass
graves next to similar images of animals. PETA officials vehemently argue
there is no difference.
Rocker Ted Nugent, an outspoken advocate of hunting and an avowed
opponent of PETA, says his children's lives have been threatened by people who
say they are affiliated with PETA.
The head of the Los Angeles animal shelter, which boasts of rescuing
63,000 animals a year, has also been targeted. Jerry Greenwalt says his
house and car have been vandalized by people representing themselves as being
from PETA; his wife had a heart attack after one of these incidents, he
adds.
Penn derides PETA's aspiration to unconditionally liberate these
animals. With freedom comes responsibilities, he says. The purpose of
liberation would be defeated because there would have to be animal jails for
creatures that kill other creatures, as they inevitably would, as well as
lesser offenses, such as defecating in the street.
Rodney Coronado, who has received at least $42,500 in support from
PETA, according to tax returns, is seen showing college students how to
make a Molotov cocktail. Coronado has admitted to bombing a Michigan State
research laboratory and pleaded guilty to six other acts of arson, Penn says.
PETA's conduct is so outrageous, it inspired Teller to break his
silence during the midseason press tour.
"I was deeply shocked by the degree of violence that's linked to
PETA. I knew that they cared more about anthropomorphizing rats than they did
about the welfare of humanity, but I didn't know the degree to which they
bombed buildings."
In all likelihood, neither do many Americans who write checks to
PETA, thinking they are supporting a group like more mainstream and
responsible animal welfare organizations such as the ASPCA and the Humane
Society.
This is why the program is not only entertaining but a public
service. And that's no bull.
10 P.M. EST for the Penn and Teller show on Showtime.
Taking the bull by the ... horns?
Tom Jicha
March 28, 2004
America has a reputation for cynicism that is undeserved: It's amazing how
much nonsense we accept unquestioningly. The wildly inventive Penn & Teller
prefer a more vulgar term for nonsense. They call it Bull----!
They've made it the title of their Showtime series, which on Thursday launches its
second season of debunking ... nonsense.
Some of the episodes are fairly frivolous, such as upcoming shows on
people's unreasonable fears -- you'll never be freaked out by a
public toilet again -- and the ridiculous lengths singles go to in pursuit
of a mate.
But the first target of the new season is a serious one: People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). The touchy-feely name is only
the start of the organization's ... nonsense, Penn & Teller argue. Of course,
Penn does all the talking. Teller is the Harpo Marx of this act.
PETA's mission statement is that it doesn't want animals to be
killed, hurt, exploited or embarrassed. These are laudable goals within reason,
which PETA rarely is. If PETA had its way, Penn notes, everyone would have to
become vegans; shoes would be made of something other than leather; rodeos
and circuses would be eliminated, as would horse and dog racing. Fishing
wouldn't be allowed, zoos would be closed and harvesting honey would
end, because this is an exploitation of bees.
Any medical research involving animals, even if it meant cures for
AIDS and cancer, would cease. PETA would not even approve of guide dogs for
the blind, again an exploitation of animals in its warped thinking.
Despite the first three letters of its name, there would be no pets, because this
amounts to slavery, according to Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder and
president.
The latter contention is one of the reasons for the program, Penn
explains. Many pet owners are donors to PETA, unaware of its extremist agenda.
They are also oblivious to the fact that the money they think they are
donating toward the welfare of animals goes to support arson and bombing of
buildings and other terrorist acts, according to Penn. These allegations are
documented through tax returns and admissions from PETA officials and
a confessed felon whose activities have been underwritten by the group.
Penn displays PETA ads that show emaciated Holocaust victims and mass
graves next to similar images of animals. PETA officials vehemently argue
there is no difference.
Rocker Ted Nugent, an outspoken advocate of hunting and an avowed
opponent of PETA, says his children's lives have been threatened by people who
say they are affiliated with PETA.
The head of the Los Angeles animal shelter, which boasts of rescuing
63,000 animals a year, has also been targeted. Jerry Greenwalt says his
house and car have been vandalized by people representing themselves as being
from PETA; his wife had a heart attack after one of these incidents, he
adds.
Penn derides PETA's aspiration to unconditionally liberate these
animals. With freedom comes responsibilities, he says. The purpose of
liberation would be defeated because there would have to be animal jails for
creatures that kill other creatures, as they inevitably would, as well as
lesser offenses, such as defecating in the street.
Rodney Coronado, who has received at least $42,500 in support from
PETA, according to tax returns, is seen showing college students how to
make a Molotov cocktail. Coronado has admitted to bombing a Michigan State
research laboratory and pleaded guilty to six other acts of arson, Penn says.
PETA's conduct is so outrageous, it inspired Teller to break his
silence during the midseason press tour.
"I was deeply shocked by the degree of violence that's linked to
PETA. I knew that they cared more about anthropomorphizing rats than they did
about the welfare of humanity, but I didn't know the degree to which they
bombed buildings."
In all likelihood, neither do many Americans who write checks to
PETA, thinking they are supporting a group like more mainstream and
responsible animal welfare organizations such as the ASPCA and the Humane
Society.
This is why the program is not only entertaining but a public
service. And that's no bull.