Post by Willow on Jul 7, 2004 10:21:43 GMT -5
Here is an article of why vaccines do not create immunity, and instead cause
sensitization of the immune system.
This is the last one...I promise, then I'm out of here! ;D I just wanted everyone to know that this isn't just "made up" stuff, but is backed by studies.
>Sensitization of the Immune System by Repeated Vaccination and Production
of
>Systemic Invasive Bacterial Infection
>
>The Swedish test of the Japanese acellular pertussis vaccine produced
>some interesting results. Eleven babies in groups V1 and V2, those who
>received the two types of acellular pertussis vaccines, also contracted
>systemic bacterial infections. Four babies died. Five babies in P1, the
>placebo group, contracted systemic bacterial infections, but none died.
This
>indicates that the substrate, combined with the bacterial and viral
>antigenic components as a "vaccine" is even more biologically harmful in
>ways beyond the pertussis component. The majority of bacterial infections
>surfaced after the second dose of vaccine, and is compatible with the
>observed peak occurrence of invasive bacterial infections between 6 and 11
>months of age - just when most babies acquire their second injection of
>trivalent DPT. The fact that repeated injection of antigens can lead to
>hyperimmunization is well known,and can lead to myrocarditis, or
enlargement
>of the heart. The Swedish trials ended in 1987.
>
>
>In the end the Swedish National Bacteriological Laboratory withdrew the
>application for licensing of a Japanese pertussis vaccine, and noted that
>the efficacy of the acellular vaccine was probably lower than the
whole-cell
>pertussis vaccine abandoned in 1979. When one considers the type of
systemic
>bacterial infections from the vaccine, it raises the legitimate question as
>to whether vaccines are assisting in the rising incidence of meningitis and
>Haemophilus influenza B in industrialized countries. Are they deliberately
>"doping" vaccines with other substances to create other problems "to be
>conquered"? How would we know, since medical authorities and the upper
>echelons of the medical industrial complex have historically demonstrated
>that they cannot be trusted? Is there any casual evidence that this might
be
>the case?
>
>In 1991, a study on Alaskan native children yielded data which provided
>evidence of a casual link between DPT injections and invasive bacterial
>injections. The highest incidence of invasive bacterial infection occurred
>after the 3rd injection - a process compatible with known scientific facts
>relative to sensitization to infectious diseases by repeated injection of
>foreign antigens. Other studies have demonstrated that most cases of
>invasive bacterial infection occur between 31 and 60 days after DPT and
oral
>polio vaccine (OPV).
>
>In 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics published an article in
>Pediatrics in which they revealed that "an application has been made for
>B-type vaccine based in part on the results of the Swedish trial", omitting
>the fact that the application for licensing in Sweden was withdrawn and
that
>Sweden has not resumed pertussis vaccination. The American Academy of
>Pediatrics that recommended that all American infants be injected with five
>doses of pertussis vaccine beginning at 2 months of age, with both whole
>cell pertussis and acellular pertussis. This approaches deliberate criminal
>homicide by the AAP, yet no one is challenging them on this. Why? Because
>the process will intentionally create the type of behaviorally aberrant
>society full of medically needy crippled children to assure continued
>financial profit? Or, is it part of an upper level population control
>mandate, or both? Why else would American doctors be oblivious to
>encephalitic effects of vaccines administered to young babies in the United
>States? Why do they "have trouble" reviewing world literature and seeing
>that pertussis vaccine does not protect against pertussis? It's incredible,
>yet true. It has to be a criminal conspiracy at the highest level.
sensitization of the immune system.
This is the last one...I promise, then I'm out of here! ;D I just wanted everyone to know that this isn't just "made up" stuff, but is backed by studies.
>Sensitization of the Immune System by Repeated Vaccination and Production
of
>Systemic Invasive Bacterial Infection
>
>The Swedish test of the Japanese acellular pertussis vaccine produced
>some interesting results. Eleven babies in groups V1 and V2, those who
>received the two types of acellular pertussis vaccines, also contracted
>systemic bacterial infections. Four babies died. Five babies in P1, the
>placebo group, contracted systemic bacterial infections, but none died.
This
>indicates that the substrate, combined with the bacterial and viral
>antigenic components as a "vaccine" is even more biologically harmful in
>ways beyond the pertussis component. The majority of bacterial infections
>surfaced after the second dose of vaccine, and is compatible with the
>observed peak occurrence of invasive bacterial infections between 6 and 11
>months of age - just when most babies acquire their second injection of
>trivalent DPT. The fact that repeated injection of antigens can lead to
>hyperimmunization is well known,and can lead to myrocarditis, or
enlargement
>of the heart. The Swedish trials ended in 1987.
>
>
>In the end the Swedish National Bacteriological Laboratory withdrew the
>application for licensing of a Japanese pertussis vaccine, and noted that
>the efficacy of the acellular vaccine was probably lower than the
whole-cell
>pertussis vaccine abandoned in 1979. When one considers the type of
systemic
>bacterial infections from the vaccine, it raises the legitimate question as
>to whether vaccines are assisting in the rising incidence of meningitis and
>Haemophilus influenza B in industrialized countries. Are they deliberately
>"doping" vaccines with other substances to create other problems "to be
>conquered"? How would we know, since medical authorities and the upper
>echelons of the medical industrial complex have historically demonstrated
>that they cannot be trusted? Is there any casual evidence that this might
be
>the case?
>
>In 1991, a study on Alaskan native children yielded data which provided
>evidence of a casual link between DPT injections and invasive bacterial
>injections. The highest incidence of invasive bacterial infection occurred
>after the 3rd injection - a process compatible with known scientific facts
>relative to sensitization to infectious diseases by repeated injection of
>foreign antigens. Other studies have demonstrated that most cases of
>invasive bacterial infection occur between 31 and 60 days after DPT and
oral
>polio vaccine (OPV).
>
>In 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics published an article in
>Pediatrics in which they revealed that "an application has been made for
>B-type vaccine based in part on the results of the Swedish trial", omitting
>the fact that the application for licensing in Sweden was withdrawn and
that
>Sweden has not resumed pertussis vaccination. The American Academy of
>Pediatrics that recommended that all American infants be injected with five
>doses of pertussis vaccine beginning at 2 months of age, with both whole
>cell pertussis and acellular pertussis. This approaches deliberate criminal
>homicide by the AAP, yet no one is challenging them on this. Why? Because
>the process will intentionally create the type of behaviorally aberrant
>society full of medically needy crippled children to assure continued
>financial profit? Or, is it part of an upper level population control
>mandate, or both? Why else would American doctors be oblivious to
>encephalitic effects of vaccines administered to young babies in the United
>States? Why do they "have trouble" reviewing world literature and seeing
>that pertussis vaccine does not protect against pertussis? It's incredible,
>yet true. It has to be a criminal conspiracy at the highest level.